Oxidative status and paraoxonase activity in children with asthma
Alpay Cakmak1
Dost Zeyrek1
Ali Atas1
Sahabettin Selek2
Ozcan Erel2
1 Department of Pediatrics, Harran
University Faculty of Medicine, Sanliurfa, Turkey
2 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Sanliurfa, Turkey
Manuscript submitted 6th March, 2009
Manuscript accepted 25th July, 2009
Clin Invest Med 2009; 32 (5): E327-E334.
Abstract
Objective: To compare paraoxonase activity and changes in
oxidative status in asthmatic children and healthy children by determining
serum paraoxonase activity and total oxidative status, total antioxidant
capacity and lipid hydroperoxidation.
Methods: Forty two asthmatic children were compared
with 32 healthy children of similar age and sex. To evaluate the paraoxonase
and oxidative status, total antioxidant capacity and lipid hydroperoxidation
were examined. Serum paraoxonase activity was evaluated by measuring the rate
of paraoxon hydrolosis. Oxidative status was evaluated by the method developed
by Erel. Lipid hydroperoxide was measured by an iodometric method.
Results: In comparison with the healthy control group,
the paraoxonase activity of the asthmatic children was found to be low (163.7 ±
73.0 (U/L) and 349.2 ± 153.9 (U/L), P = 0.002) and total oxidant status (9.0 ± 3.5
μmol H2O2 Eq/L and 13.4 ± 7.0 μmol H2O2
Eq/L, P =0.002),
total antioxidant capacity (5.5 ± 2.5 µmol Trolox Eq/L and 1.0 ± 0.6 µmol
Trolox Eq/L, P <
0.001), and lipid hydroperoxidation values (9.9 ± 3.4 μmol H2O2
Eq/L and 4.4 ± 1.5 μmol H2O2 Eq/L, P < 0.001) were found to be high.
The high density lipoprotein (HDL) concentration of the asthmatic children was
lower than that in the control group (40.1 ± 9.2 mg/dl and 54.5 ± 15.9 mg/dl, P
< 0.001)
Conclusion: In asthmatic children, when total oxidant status, total antioxidant capacity and lipid hydroperoxidation levels increase, paraoxonase activity decreased.
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a major killer
and the most common cause of mortality and morbidity in the world.1
It usually involves middle and older age groups but, recently, the incidence of
CHD in younger individuals has been increasing.2 Atherosclerosis is
a process that starts in childhood and has a long preclinical phase before
leading to clinical manifestations which usually appear in middle age.3
Changes in the peripheral vascular endothelium are the earliest signs of
atherosclerosis and CHD.4 This has been demonstrated in asymptomatic
children and young adults who are healthy but carry risk factors for
atherosclerosis (e.g., high cholesterol, smoking, diabetes).5 HDL
retards the accumulation of lipid peroxides on LDL cholesterol6
apparently due to paraoxonase which is an enzyme located on HDL particles.7
Paraoxonase has two functions. First, it contributes to detoxification of
organophosphorous compounds, including the pesticide paraoxon. Secondly, it
hydrolyzes lipid peroxides and prevents LDL oxidation.8
In both asthma and atherosclerosis, leukotrienes, which are potential
inflammation mediators, play a role. 9,10 Some studies have
suggested that asthma itself could be a risk factor for stroke and heart
disease.11,12 In addition, allergic disorders such as allergic
rhinitis or asthma may also contribute to enhanced risk for atherosclerosis.13
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory pulmonary disease related to increased
oxidative stress.14 The association between chronic inflammation and
oxidative stress is well documented. Elevated levels of reactive oxygen species
(ROS), such as hydroxyl radicals, superoxides, and peroxides in inflammatory
conditions have been reported previously.15
The cells infiltrating the bronchial mucosa in patients with asthma
produce a variety of mediators including ROS.16 Increased production
of ROS leads to an imbalance between the oxidative forces and the antioxidant
defense systems favouring oxidative injury has been implicated in the
pathogenesis of asthma.17 However, when the production of damaging
ROS exceeds the capacity of the body's antioxidant defenses to detoxify them, a
condition known as “oxidative stress” occurs.18 ROS may exert a number
of toxic effects which have been demonstrated in many different biological
systems. Oxidative stress leads to changes such as modification of receptor
activity and signaling and release of endogenous mediators of inflammation. An
imbalance in oxidant–antioxidant activity is involved in much free radical
mediated pathology, e.g. ischemia-reperfusion and asthma.19
This suggests that an increase in oxidative stress and a decrease in
paraoxonase activity may be important contributors to the acceleration of the
progression of atherosclerosis and, also that, in asthmatic patients, atherosclerosis
may start in childhood.
This study compared the paraoxonase activity in asthmatic children with that of healthy children by evaluating total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), lipid hydroperoxidation (LOOH) and lipid profile.
Materials and Methods
Study groups
The parents of all patients signed informed
consent forms and the Ethics Committee of the Hospital approved the study. Forty-two subjects, 6-15 yr, who had
been attending the Pediatric Allergy Unit of the Medical Faculty of Harran
University for at least one year were included in the study. The clinical
severity of the asthma was determined using the criteria (appropriate clinical
and respiratory function tests) defined in the Global Initiative for Asthma
guidelines (GINA).20 A family history of atopy was considered
positive if atopy was present in parents and/or siblings (bronchial asthma,
allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis). In all patients, allergen sensitivity
was performed with specific IgE (sIgE) and skin prick test (SPT) to aeroallergens.
Patients with clinical signs of asthma who had a positive sIgE in addition to
sensitivity against at least one aeroallargen on the SPT were included in the
atopic asthma groups. Asthmatic patients were not receiving any controller
medication and had not had any symptoms of lower or upper respiratory tract
infection or asthma exacerbation within the previous 4 weeks.
The control group consisted of 32 age-matched
healthy children (6 - 16 yr). Healthy children were chosen from those referred
to a pediatric outpatient clinic in Harran University Hospital, where all
children periodically undergo check-ups for their growth and development.
Control patients were evaluated with regard to chronic and/or severe infections,
rheumatological and autoimmune disorders, and familial and personal history of
atopy, and also by laboratory tests. Children were included in the control
group if they had no personal and familial history of atopy and no signs of
atopic disorder, and if they were negative for sIgE and SPT.
As smoking effects oxidative status, patients came from non-smoking
households, and the control group was also selected from non-smoking
households. All patients were weighed and measured and a calculation was made
according to the Body Mass Index Standard Deviation Score (BMI SDS).21
Study measurements
SIgE levels: Serum allergen sIgE measurements were
performed using the CAP FEIA method (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) and evaluated
with regard to the standard deviations listed in the user’s manual according to
age-sIgE levels reported by the World Health Organization. The sensitivity of
the kits used for measurements was standardized to to 0.35-100 kU/L for serum
sIgE, which is used to detect the sensitization in the serum against inhaled
allergens (house dust mite, yeasts, animal dander, grass pollen, trees and wild
grass); the result was considered positive if the measured value was greater
than 0.35 kU/L.
Skin prick test: Prick testing for aeroallergen sensitivity was
done using lancets (Stallerpoint, Paris, France) providing a standard puncture
of 1 mm. Commercial allergen solutions manufactured by Allergopharma (Joachim
Ganzer KG, Reinbeck, Germany) were used for the skin test. Forty-four different
allergens consisting of housedust mite, grass, wild grass, tree pollens, fungi, animal dander, and
insects were tested. Test sites were evaluated 20 min after allergen
application using European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology criteria.
22 The diameter of the induration on the volar aspect of the forearm was
scored between 1 and 4 if it was at least half of the diameter of the
induration caused by a positive control (1 mg/L histamine). A score >
3 was considered significant.
Blood samples
Blood samples were obtained following overnight
fasting. Blood samples were collected into empty tubes and immediately stored
on ice at 4°C. The serum was then separated from the cells by centrifugation at
3000 rpm for 10 min. Serum samples for measurement of TOS and TAC levels and
prolidase activity were stored at −80°C until they were used.
Measurement of paraoxonase and arylesterase activities
Paraoxonase and arylesterase activities were
measured using paraoxon and phenylacetate substrates. The rate of paraoxon hydrolysis
(diethyl-p-nitrophenylphosphate) was measured by monitoring the increase of
absorbance at 412 nm at 37 °C. The amount of generated p-nitrophenol was
calculated from the molar absorptivity coefficient at pH 8, which was 17,000 M−1
cm−1. 23 Paraoxonase activity was expressed as U/L serum.
Phenylacetate was used as a substrate to measure the arylesterase activity.
Enzymatic activity was calculated from the molar absorptivity coefficient of
the produced phenol, 1310 M−1 cm−1. One unit of arylesterase
activity was defined as 1 μmol phenol generated/min under the above conditions
and expressed as U/L serum. 24 Paraoxonase phenotype distribution
was determined by a double substrate method that measures the ratio of
paraoxonase activity (with 1 M NaCl in the assay) to arylesterase activity,
using phenylacetate. 23
Measurement of total antioxidant capacity (TAC)
The TAC of serum was determined using a novel
automated measurement method, developed by Erel.25 In this method, hydroxyl
radical, which is the most potent biological radical, is produced. In the
assay, ferrous ion solution, which is present in Reagent 1 is mixed with
hydrogen peroxide, which is present in Reagent 2. The sequentially produced
radicals, such as brown colored dianisidinyl radical cation, produced by the
hydroxyl radical, are also potent radicals. Using this method, the
antioxidative effect of the sample against the potent-free radical reactions,
which is initiated by the produced hydroxyl radical, is measured. The assay has
excellent precision values of lower than 3%. The results are expressed as mmol
Trolox Eq/L.
Measurement of total oxidant status (TOS)
The TOS of serum was determined using a novel
automated measurement method, developed by Erel.26 Oxidants present
in the sample oxidize the ferrous ion–o-dianisidine complex to ferric ion. The
oxidation reaction is enhanced by glycerol molecules, which are abundantly
present in the reaction medium. The ferric ion makes a coloured complex with
xylenol orange in an acidic medium. The color intensity, which can be measured
spectrophotometrically, is related to the total amount of oxidant molecules
present in the sample. The assay is calibrated with hydrogen peroxide and the
results are expressed in terms of micromolar hydrogen peroxide equivalent per
liter (μmol H2O2 Eq/L).
Measurement of total peroxide concentration of plasma (LOOH)
Serum LOOH levels were measured with the
ferrous ion oxidation-xylenol orange (FOX-2) assay. The principle of the assay
depends on the oxidation of ferrous ion to ferric ion via various oxidants and
the ferric ion produced is measured with xylenol orange. LOOH are reduced by
triphenyl phosphine (TPP), which is a specific reductant for lipids. The
difference between with and without TPP pretreatment gives LOOH levels.27
Measurement of Lipid profiles
Plasma triglyceride, total cholesterol, LDL,
HDL, VLDL were measured by an automated chemistry analyser (Aeroset, Abbott,
USA) using commercial kits (Abbott).
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria included the presence of
chronic disease, concomitant inflammatory disease such as infections and
autoimmune disorders, immuncompromised patients, diabetes mellitus, familial
hypercholesterolemia, major depression, neoplastic diseases, liver and kidney
diseases and recent major surgical procedure. Patients suffering from heart
disease, valvular heart disease, idiopathic hypertrophic and dilated
cardiomyopathy, non-cardiac causes of chest pain or reflux esophagitis were
also excluded. Patients taking antioxidant drugs, vitamins, diuretics, hormone
replacement therapy and those who smoked were also excluded.
Statistical Analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Qualitative variables were assessed by Chi-square test. Correlation analyses were performed using Pearson's correlation test or Spearman’s correlation test. The differences between the different groups of controls and patients were analyzed by unpaired t-test or Mann–Whitney U test. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Data were analyzed with the SPSS® for Windows computing program (Version 11.5).
Results
The demographic and clinical data of the study
population are shown in Table 1. There were no differences between the two
groups with regard to age, sex and BMI SDS (Table 1).
The paraoxonase level in the asthma patient group was lower than in the
control group (Table 2). TAC, TOS and LOOH levels in the asthma patient group
were higher than the control group (Table 2).
There was no correlation between the TAC, TOS, LOOH level and
paraoxonase activity between the patient and control group. The values for
plasma triglyceride, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C),
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and very-low-density lipoprotein
cholesterol (VLDL-C) for both the patient and the control group are shown in
Table 3.
SPT of the asthma patient group were 45% grass pollen, 30% polysensitization, 15% mites and 10% alternaria. No difference was determined in the paraoxonase activity and oxidative level between the mite positive group and patients positive for other allergens.
Discussion
In this study the paraoxonase activity level of
the asthma patients was found to be lower than in the control group. In 3
studies in the literature28,29,30 paraoxonase activity in asthma
patients were not different. Also, Can et al.30 observed that
asthmatic patients had increased paraoxonase activity after treatment.
Evidence of increased paraoxonase activity in asthmatic patients after treatment,
may indicate that paraoxonase could play a role in asthma.
The study group of asthmatic children, particularly, consisted of those
who were not experiencing an exacerbation of the asthma. A reduced level of
paraoxonase activity in children with asthma could arise from including in the
study those who had previously been under regular follow-up and where the
asthma had not been able to be fully controlled. The reduced level of paraoxonase
activity in our study may be related to regional and ethnic differences.
A previous study reported an increase in oxidative stress and a decrease
in paraoxonase activity and also down regulation of paraoxonase expression.31
In addition, an inverse relationship between serum reduced paraoxonase activity
and increased oxidative stress in patients with CHD has been seen.32
The acquired information about the relationships between oxidative stress and
paraoxonase and paraoxonase and lipid metabolism indicates that paraoxonase may
play a role in the development of atherosclerosis in asthma. Our study shows
paraoxonase activity and the oxidative status outside of any treatment period.
The serum HDL concentration is inversely correlated with atherosclerosis
risk.33 The mechanism for this continues to be subject of
considerable debate. However, recent studies have suggested more diverse mechanisms.
HDL protects against oxidative modification of lowdensity lipoprotein (LDL)6,
which is believed to be central to the initiation and progression of
atherosclerosis.34 The antioxidant activity of HDL relates to its enzymes,
primarily paraoxonase and these can prevent lipid peroxide accumulation on LDL
both in vitro and in vivo.35 The lipid peroxidation products of the
asthmatic patients in our study were seen to increase in a similar way to those
of previous studies.28,36,37
No difference was reported in the lipid values between the patient group
and the control group in a previous study29 whereas, in our study, a
low level of HDL-C was determined in the patient group in comparison to the
control group (Table 3). This low level of HDL-C may be due to these asthmatic
children having been previously under regular follow-up and the asthma not having
been able to be fully controlled. An increase in LDL oxidation arises from a
low level of HDL and paraoxonase, thus possibly indicating an acceleration of
the progress of atherosclerosis in asthmatic children.
The balance between oxidant–antioxidant system is impaired in patients
with asthma.38
Many observations suggest that levels of oxidative stress are increased in
children and in adults with asthma, not only in the lungs but also in the
circulation.38
Several studies have suggested that, when the oxidant system increases, there
is a decrease in the antioxidant system.28,39 In our study, TOS and TAC increased
together. A similar previous study, reported40 that, when there was an increase in
the oxidant system, there was also an increase in the antioxidant system.
Oxidative stress is a key component of inflammation and inflammatory
disorders. Host antioxidant systems are generally activated in response to the
oxidant attack, but individuals have different capacities of antioxidant
defense which are, in part, genetically determined.41 Ercan et al.42 showed that there were genetic
differences in the antioxidant response. Other studies have shown that as
oxidative stress increases so the antioxidant capacity increases as a protective
mechanism.43
Due to the socio-economic conditions in the region, our cases were diagnosed
with asthma at a late stage and were not receiving regular check-ups. In this
situation they are vulnerable to long-term oxidative stress and so the development
of the antioxidant system could be in response to that.
Limitations of this study were that there was no evaluation of the
relationship between the severity of the disease and the treatment, and that
paraoxonase gene polymorphism was not been taken into account.
In conclusion, we determined that the enzyme paraoxonase, which has an antioxidant function and is known to play a role in the development of atherosclerosis, was low in asthmatic children.
References
1. Reddy KS. Cardiovascular disease in India.World Health Stat 1993;46:101-7.
2. Gupta VP, Gupta Rajeev. Meta-analysis of coronary heart disease prevalence in Indian. Indian Heart J 1996;48:241-5.
3. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature 1993;362:801-9.
4. Raitakari OT, Pitkanen OP, Lehtimaki T, et al. In vivo low density lipoprotein relates to coronary reactivity in young men. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:97-102.
5. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, et al. Noninvasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet 1992;340:1111-5.
6. Mackness MI, Abbott CA, Arrol S, Durrington PN. The role of high-density and lipid soluble antioxidant vitamins in inhibiting low-density lipoprotein oxidation. Biochem J 1993;294:829-35.
7. Watson AD, Berliner JA, Hama SY, et al. Protective effect of high density lipoprotein associated paraoxonase. Inhibition of the biological activity of minimally oxidized low density lipoprotein. J Clin Invest 1995;96:2882-91.
8. Mackness B, Mackness MI, Arrol S, Turkie W, Durrington PN. Effect of the human serum paraoxonase 55 and 192 genetic polymorphisms on the protection by high density lipoprotein against low density lipoprotein oxidative modification. FEBS Lett 1998;423:57-60
9.
Dwyer
JH, Allayee H, Dwyer KM, et al. Arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase promoter genotype,
dietary arachidonic acid, and atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2004;350:29-37.
10. Jala VR, Haribabu B. Leukotrienes and atherosclerosis: new roles for old mediators. Trends Immunol 2004;25:315-22.
11. Iribarren C, Tolstykh IV, Eisner MD. Are patients with asthma at increased risk of coronary heart disease?. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:743-8.
12. Schanen JG, Iribarren C, Shahar E, et al. Asthma and incident cardiovascular disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Thorax 2005;60:633-8.
13. Togias A. Systemic effects of local allergic disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;113:8-14.
14. Vignola AM, Chanez P, Campbell AM, et al. Airway inflammation in mild intermittent and in persistent asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:403-9.
15. Grisham M B, Jourd’heuil D, Wink D A. Review article: Chronic inflammation and reactive oxygen and nitrogen metabolism – implications in DNA damage and mutagenesis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000;14:3-9.
16. Andreadis AA, Hazen SL, Comhair SA, Erzurum SC. Oxidative and nitrosative events in asthma. Free Radic Biol Med 2003;35:213-25.
17.
Owen
S, Pearson D, Suarez-Mendez V, O'Driscoll R, Woodcock A. Evidence of
free-radical activity in asthma. N Engl J Med 1991;325:586-7.
18. Sarban S, Kocyigit A, Yazar M, Isikan UE. Plasma total antioxidant capacity, lipid peroxidation, and erythrocyte antioxidant enzyme activities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Clin Biochem 2005;38:981-6.
19. Beck-Speier I, Dayal N, Karg E, et al. Oxidative stress and lipid mediators induced in alveolar macrophages by ultrafine particles. Free Radic. Biol. Med 2005;38:1080-92.
20.
Global
Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Report [Internet]. Global Strategy for Asthma
Management and Prevention. Updated 2007. Available at: http://www.ginasthma.com.
Accessed November 10, 2008.
21. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/growthcharts/datafiles.htm
22. Dreborg S, Frew A. Allergen standardization and skin tests. EAACI Position Paper. Allergy 1993; 48: 49-82.
23. Eckerson HW, Wyte MC, La Du BN. The human serum paraoxonase/arylesterase polymorphism. Am J Hum Genet 1983;35:1126-38.
24. Haagen L, Brock A. A new automated method for phenotyping arylesterase (E.C.3.1.1.2.) based upon inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of 4-nitrophenyl acetate by phenyl acetate. Eur J Clin Chem Clim Biochem 1992;30:391–5.
25. Erel O. A novel automated method to measure total antioxidant response against potent free radical reactions. Clin Biochem 2004;37:112-9.
26. Erel O. A new automated colorimetric method for measuring total oxidant status. Clin Biochem 2005;38:1103-11.
27. Nourooz ZJ. Ferrous ion oxidation in presence of xylenol orange for detection of lipid hydroperoxides in plasma. Methods Enzymol 1999;300:58-62.
28.
Górnicka
G, Bełtowski J, Wójcicka G, Jamroz A. Serum paraoxonase activity, total
antioxidant potential and lipid peroxidation products in children with
bronchial asthma exacerbation. Wiad Lek 2002;55:257-63.
29.
Ekmekci
OB, Donma O, Ekmekci H, et al. Plasma paraoxonase activities, lipoprotein
oxidation, and trace element interaction in asthmatic patients. Biol Trace Elem
Res 2006;111:41-52.
30. Can M, Mungan AG, Acıkgoz F, Yuksel B, Demirtas S, Tomac N. Effect of Montelukast Treatment on Serum Paraoxonase Activity in Asthmatic Children. Turk J Med Sci 2007; 37 (6): 373-6.
31. Aviram M, Rosenblat M, Billecke S, et al. Human serum paraoxonase (PON 1) is inactivated by oxidized low density lipoprotein and preserved by antioxidants. Free Radical Biol Med 1999;26:892-904.
32. Kabaroglu C, Mutaf I, Boydak B, et al. Association between serum paraoxonase activity and oxidative stress in acute coronary syndromes. Acta Cardiol 2004;59:606-11.
33. Parthasarathy S, Barnett J, Fong LG. High-density lipoprotein inhibits the oxidative modification of low-density lipoprotein. Biochim Biophys Acta 1990;1044:275-83.
34. Steinberg D, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE, Khoo JC, Witztum JL. Beyond cholesterol modifications of low-density lipoprotein that increase its atherogenicity. N Engl J Med 1989;320:915-24.
35. Mackness MI, Durrington PN. High-density lipoprotein, its enzymes and its potential to influence lipid peroxidation. Atherosclerosis 1995;115:243-53.
36. Rahman I, Morrison D, Donaldson K, MacNee W. Systemic oxidative stress in asthma, COPD, and smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:1055–60.
37. Vural H, Aksoy N, Ceylan E, Gencer M, Ozguner F. Leukocyte oxidant and antioxidant status in asthmatic patients. Arch Med Res. 2005;36:502-6.
38. Sirven V, Seguerra E, Frieri M. Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Premature Infants-Possible Predisposition to Hyperreactive Airway Disease and Allergy Clin Immunol Int-J World Allergy Org 2006;18:192-6.
39. Liao MF, Chen CC, Hsu MH. Evaluation of the serum antioxidant status in asthmatic children. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 2004;45:213-7.
40. Nadeem A, Chhabra SK, Masood A, Raj HG. Increased oxidative stress and altered levels of antioxidants in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;111:72-8.
41. Barnes PJ. Reactive oxygen species and airway inflammation. Free Radic Biol Med 1990: 9:235-43.
42. Ercan H, Birben E, Dizdar EA, et al. Oxidative stres and genetic and epidemiologic determinants of oxidant injury in childhood asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;118:1097-1104.
43. Sen CK. Oxidants and antioxidants in exercise. J Appl Physiol 1995;79:675-86.
Correspondence to:
Alpay Cakmak, MD
Harran University School of Medicine
Department of Pediatrics
TR-63100, Sanliurfa, TURKEY
e-mail: alpaycakmak@gmail.com
|
TABLE 1. Demographic data of asthma patients
and healthy subjects |
||||
|
|
Asthma patients (n: 42) |
Controls (n: 32) |
OR (95%CI) |
P* |
|
Age (yr) |
9.0 ± 2.8 |
9.4 ± 3.8 |
|
NS |
|
Sex (M/F) |
20/22 |
10/22 |
0.50 (0.17-1.45) |
NS |
|
BMI SDS |
0.77 ± 0.25 |
0.61 ± 0.20 |
|
NS |
|
Atopy in family (%) |
17 (40.4) |
- |
|
|
|
NS: Not Significant |
||||
|
TABLE 2. Paraoxonase activity and
oxidative-antioxidative parameters in asthma patients and control groups |
|||
|
|
Asthma patients (n=42) |
Controls (n=32) |
P* |
|
Paraoxonase (U/L) |
163.7 ± 73.0 |
349.2 ± 153.9 |
0.002 |
|
TOS (μmolH2O2 Equiv./L) |
13.4 ± 7.0 |
9.0 ± 3.5 |
0.002 |
|
LOOH (µmol H2O2/L) |
9.9 ± 3.4 |
4.4 ± 1.5 |
<0.001 |
|
TAC (µmol Trolox Eq./L) |
5.5 ± 2.5 |
1.0 ± 0.6 |
<0.001 |
|
TOS: total oxidative status, TAC: total
antioxidant capacity, LOOH: total peroxide concentration |
|||
|
TABLE 3. Asthma patients and control group
lipid profile |
|||
|
|
Asthma patients (n:42 ) |
Controls (n:32) |
P* |
|
Triglyceride (mg/dl) |
114.3 ± 59.3 |
117.9 ± 31.9 |
NS |
|
Cholesterol (mg/dl) |
150.7 ± 27.0 |
153.8 ± 24.7 |
NS |
|
HDL-C (mg/dl) |
40.1 ± 9.2 |
54.5 ± 15.9 |
<0.001 |
|
LDL-C (mg/dl) |
85.2 ± 26.4 |
90.0 ± 17.2 |
NS |
|
VLDL-C (mg/dl) |
23.6 ± 13.8 |
28.0 ± 22.3 |
NS |
|
The values represent the mean ± SD. NS: Not Significant |
|||
© 2007-2012 Canadian Society for Clinical Investigation.
C.I.M. provides open access to all of its content 6 months after the date of publication